Kaikki te jotka asutte 5G mastojen lähellä, niin tunsitte varmaan eilen voimakasta väsymystä.
Se ei johtunut koronasta, vaan se johtui siitä, että 5G mastojen gigahertsitehoja nostettiin eilen kakkosaallon tasolle.
Tämä on nyt sitten se koronan kakkosaalto, että tulee päivittäistä väsymystä ja ihmiset eivät oikein tiedä, että mistä se johtuu.
5G katvealueet Elisan verkoista löytyy täältä: https://elisa.fi/kuuluvuus/
Kansainvälinen vetoomus on jo lähtenyt eteenpäin koskien tätä vaarallista 5G säteilytystä.
5G ja Korona
Se mitä Bill "Kill" Gates ei suostut kertomaan on se, että tämä 5G säteily aiheuttaa voimakasta pahoinvointia ja väsymystä. Heikentää kehon immuunijärjestelmää sekä lisää päänsärkyä ja vaikeuttaa happisaturaatiota.
Ihmisen kehosta kun yli 73 % on vettä, niin se 5G säteily vaikuttaa suoraan niihin molekyyleihin.
Hengitysmaski taas alentaa kehon happisaturaatiota 20-60 % lisää, joten älyätte varmaan nyt, että niillä hengitysmaskeilla on tarkoitus vain sairastuttaa koko väestö.
Joten tämä 5G teknologia tulee tuhota ennen kuin on liian myöhäistä. Internet yhteydet saadaan jo vedettyä valokuituna ja tähän teknologiaan meidän pitäisi panostaa, eikä ihmisten mikroaaltosäteilyllä sairastuttamiseen.
Koronavirustestihuijaus
Tämä koronavirushuijaus perustuu siihen, että testikin on feikki ja se on pelkkä PCR menetelmällä tehty hengitystien-eritenäyte nukleiinihaponosoitusmenetelmällä PCR.
Se suurin huijaus tässä on siinä, että jos sinulla on kehossasi sen koronaviruksen vasta-aineet, niin silloin se koronatestipuikosta löytynyt laboratorio tulos näyttää sitä positiivista tulosta.
Vasta-aine on siis se ihmisen kehosta usein löytyvä ainesosa, joka tappaa nämä monenlaiset virukset siellä itsestään.
Mutta kun tätä touhua nyt katsoo, niin BIG PHARMA:lla on aivan hirveä into saada tungettua se koronatestipuikko mahdollisimman monen nenään sisään.
Että yrittääkö ne nyt myrkyttää mahdollisimman monen ihmisen elimistön näillä RNA-ohjelmilla, kun jos tätä touhua järjellisesti seuraa, niin kyllä rokotevalmistaja GlaxoSmithKline tässä touhussa jotain rahallista hyötyä nyt on itselleen hakemassa, koska THL on saanut sieltä miljoonien eurojen koronatestilahjukset ja näistä ei ole toimittajat uskaltaneet vieläkään puhua juuri yhtään mitään.
Koronavirustutkimukset perustuvat epämääräisen pikkufirman kyseenalaiseen dataan
Lisäksi nämä koronavirustutkimukset ovat perustuneet maailmalla mitättömän pikkufirman tutkimuksiin, jonka palveluksessa ovat olleet entinen pornotähti ja tieteiskirjailija.
5G on suurin riski ja sillä ei ole koronaan sairastumisella mitään tekemistä
5G teknologia on suuri terveysriski, koska sitä käytetään tässä korona ihmiskokeessa.
24.08.2020 näiden 5G mastojen Ghz voimakkuutta nostettiin ja ne ovat huhujen mukaan nyt n. 30 Ghz:n hujakoilla.
Mutta niistä löytyy vielä kapasiteettia aina 90 Ghz lukemiin.
Tosiaan siellä Kiinan Wuhanissa ilmeisesti keväällä testattiin jo, että miten ne 90 Ghz taajuudet pelaavat, kun siellä pyörtyili ihmisiä keskellä päivää.
Tämä pyörtyileminen johtui 5G säteilystä, ei koronaviruksesta.
Joten tämä 5G ihmiskoe tulee lopettaa Suomen valtion osalta ja siihen tarvitsen nyt teidän apuanne siellä.
Vetoamme YK:hon, WHO:hon, EU:hun ja Euroopan neuvostoon sekä kaikkien kansakuntien hallituksiin,
(a) Että ne ryhtyvät välittömiin toimiin keskeyttääkseen 5G-teknologian käyttöönoton maassa ja avaruudessa ja näin suojelevat ihmiskuntaa, erityisesti sikiöitä, vauvoja, lapsia, nuoria ja raskaana olevia naisia, sekä ympäristöä;
(b) Että ne noudattavat YK:n lasten oikeuksien sopimusta sekä Euroopan neuvoston päätöslauselmaa 1815 ja tiedottavat kansalaisille, myös opettajille ja lääkäreille, mikroaaltosäteilyn aiheuttamista terveyshaitoista sekä kertovat, miksi pitää ja miten voi välttää langatonta viestintää ja tukiasemia erityisesti päiväkodeissa, kouluissa, sairaaloissa, kotona ja työpaikoilla sekä näiden läheisyydessä;
(c) Että ne suosivat ja rakentavat langallisia teleyhteyksiä langattomien sijaan;
(d) Että ne estävät langattoman ja televiestintäteollisuuden lobbausorganisaatioita näiden taivutellessa viranomaisia tekemään päätöksiä, joista seuraa nykyistä enemmän mikroaaltosäteilyä, mukaan lukien 5G-teknologia maan päällä ja avaruudessa;
(e) Että ne nimittävät välittömästi – ilman teollisuuden vaikutusta – kansainvälisiä tutkijaryhmiä, jotka koostuvat puolueettomista sähkömagneettisiin kenttiin ja terveyteen perehtyneistä tutkijoista, joilla ei ole eturistiriitoja (120). Näiden tutkijaryhmien tehtävänä olisi luoda mikroaaltosäteilylle uudet kansainväliset turvallisuusstandardit, jotka eivät perustu vain säteilytehoon, vaan ottavat huomioon kumulatiivisen altistumisen ja suojelevat kaikilta terveys- ja ympäristövaikutuksilta, eikä yksinomaan lämpövaikutuksilta tai vain ihmisiin kohdistuvilta vaikutuksilta;
(f) Että ne nimittävät välittömästi—ilman teollisuuden vaikutusta—kansainvälisiä tutkijaryhmiä, jotka koostuvat sähkömagneettiseen säteilyyn, terveyteen, biologiaan ja ilmakehän fysiikkaan erikoistuneista tutkijoista. Näiden tutkijaryhmien tehtävänä olisi kehittää kattava sääntelykehys sen varmistamiseksi, että ulkoavaruuden eri käyttötarkoitukset ovat turvallisia ihmisille ja ympäristölle. Säännöstössä tulisi huomioida mikroaaltosäteily, avaruusrakettien pakokaasut, niiden nokipäästöt ja avaruusromu sekä näiden vaikutukset otsoniin (121), ilmaston lämpenemiseen (122), ilmakehään ja elämän säilymiseen maassa. Maanpäällisen ja avaruuteen sijoitetun teknologian pitää olla ekologisesti kestävää (123) ja ottaa huomioon aikuiset, lapset, eläimet ja kasvit.
Lähettäkää vastauksenne vetoomuksen vastuuhenkilölle
Vastauksesta pitää käydä ilmi yksityiskohtaisesti ne toimenpiteet, joihin aiotte ryhtyä suojellaksenne maailman väestöä mikroaaltosäteilyltä, erityisesti 5G-säteilyltä. Julkaisemme tämän vetoomuksen ja vastauksenne siihen: www.5gSpaceAppeal.org.Kohteliaimmin,
Arthur Firstenberg, vetoomuksen vastuuhenkilö, info@5gSpaceAppeal.org
Ensimmäiset allekirjoittajat
AFRIKKA
Lauraine Margaret Helen Vivian, PhD, Anthropology and Psychiatry; Honorary Research Associate, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Signatory for South Africa
AASIA
Girish Kumar, PhD, Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India
AUSTRALIA
Don Maisch, PhD, Independent researcher, author of ”The Procrustean Approach”, Lindisfarne,Tasmania, Australia
EUROOPPA
Alfonso Balmori, BSc, Master in Environmental Education, Biologist. Valladolid, SpainKlaus Buchner, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, MEP – Member of the European Parliament, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., München, Germany
Daniel Favre, Dr. phil. nat., Biologist, A.R.A. (Association Romande Alerte aux Ondes Electromagnétiques), Switzerland
Annie Sasco, MD, DrPH, SM, HDR, former Chief of Research Unit of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon; former Acting Chief, Programme for Cancer Control of the World Health Organization (WHO); former Director of Research at the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM); France
POHJOIS-AMERIKKA
Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, residing in Portland, Oregon, USA
Kate B. Showers, PhD, Soil Science, Senior Research Fellow, Centre for World Environmental History, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK, residing in Bolton-Est, Québec, Canada
ETELÄ-AMERIKKA
Carlos Sosa, MD, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
Lähdeviitteet
1 De Grasse M. AT&T outlines 5G network architecture. RCR Wireless News, Oct. 20, 2016. https://www.rcrwireless.com/20161020/network-infrastructure/att-outlines-5g-network-architecture-tag4. Accessed July 9, 2018.
2 Hong W, Jiang ZH, Yu C, et al. Multibeam antenna technologies for 5G wireless communications. IEEE Tr Ant Prop. 2017;65(12):6231-6249. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2712819.
3 Chou H-T. Design Methodology for the Multi-Beam Phased Array of Antennas with Relatively Arbitrary Coverage Sector. Conference paper: 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation; Paris, France. doi: 10.23919/EuCAP.2017.7928095.
4 47 CFR § 30.202 – Power limits.
5 SpaceX, WorldVu, Boeing, Telesat Canada and Iridium.
6 Federal Communications Commission. Pending Application for Satellite Space and Earth Station Authorization. Schedule S, Technical Report. Dated April 2016, filed March 1, 2017.http://licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/download.do?attachment_key=1200245. Accessed June 17, 2018.
7 Governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology. Cellular Phone Task Force website. www.cellphonetaskforce.org/governments-and-organizations-that-ban-or-warn-against-wireless- technology/. Accessed June 10, 2018. Continually updated.
8 The International Doctors ́ Appeal (Freiburger Appeal). http://freiburger-appell-2012.info/en/home.php?lang=EN. Published in 2012. Accessed June 10, 2018.
9 International appeal: scientists call for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposure. International EMF Scientist Appeal website. https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal. Published May 11, 2015. Accessed June 10, 2018. As of March 2018, 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations had signed the Appeal.
10 Glaser Z. Cumulated index to the bibliography of reported biological phenomena ('effects') and clinical manifestations attributed to microwave and radio-frequency radiation: report, supplements (no. 1-9).BEMS newsletter (B-1 through B-464), 1971-1981. http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Zory-Glasers-index.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2018. Report and 9 supplements issued by Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda, MD; Research Division, Bureau of Medicine & Surgery, Dept. of the Navy, Washington, DC; Electromagnetic Radiation Project Office, Naval Medical Research & Development Command, Bethesda, MD; Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren, VA; and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Rockville, MD. Index by Julie Moore and Associates, Riverside, CA, 1984. Lt. Zorach Glaser, PhD, catalogued 5,083 studies, books and conference reports for the US Navy through 1981.
11 Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. Sage Associates; 2012. www.bioinitiative.org. Accessed June 10, 2018. The 1,470-page BioInitiative Report, authored by an international group of 29 experts, has reviewed more than 1,800 new studies and is continually updated.
12 Grigoriev Y. Bioeffects of modulated electromagnetic fields in the acute experiments (results of Russian researches). Annu Russ Natl Comm Non-Ionising Radiat Protect. 2004:16-73.http://bemri.org/publications/biological-effects-of-non-ionizing-radiation/78-grigoriev- bioeffects07/file.html. Accessed June 17, 2018.
13 Obajuluwa AO, Akinyemi AJ, Afolabi OB, et al. Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic waves alters acetylcholinesterase gene expression, exploratory and motor coordination-linked behaviour in male rats.Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:530-534.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475001730063X/pdfft?md5=0af5af76124b1f89f6d 23c90c5c7764f&pid=1-s2.0-S221475001730063X-main.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.
14 Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang G-J, et al. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. JAMA. 2012;305(8):808-813.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3184892. Accessed June 17, 2018.
15 Eghlidospour M, Ghanbari A, Mortazavi S, Azari H. Effects of radiofrequency exposure emitted from a GSM mobile phone on proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of neural stem cells. Anat Cell Biol. 2017;50(2):115-123. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5509895. Accessed June 17, 2018.16 Hardell L, Carlberg C. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumors. Int J Oncol.2009;35(1):5-17. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijo/35/1/5/download. Accessed June 17, 2018.17 Bandara P, Weller S. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(17):1819-1823. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2047487317734898. Accessed June 17, 2018.
18 Deshmukh P et al. Cognitive impairment and neurogenotoxic effects in rats exposed to low-intensity microwave radiation. Int J Toxicol. 2015;34(3):284-290. doi: 10.1177/1091581815574348.
19 Zothansiama, Zosangzuali M, Lalramdinpuii M, Jagetia GC. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromag Biol Med. 2017;36(3):295-305. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2017.1350584.
20 Zwamborn A, Vossen S, van Leersum B, Ouwens M, Mäkel W. Effects of Global Communication system radio-frequency fields on Well Being and Cognitive Functions of human subjects with and without subjective complaints. TNO Report FEL-03-C148. The Hague: TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory; 2003.http://www.milieugezondheid.be/dossiers/gsm/TNO_rapport_Nederland_sept_2003.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2018.
21 Havas M. When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer? Environ Pollut. 2017;221:501-505. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.018.
22 Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Mailankot M. Spatial memory performance of Wistar rats exposed to mobile phone. Clinics. 2009;64(3):231-234.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2666459. Accessed June 17, 2018.
23 Houston BJ, Nixon B, King BV, De Iuliis GN, Aitken RJ. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. Reproduction. 2016;152(6):R263-R266. http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/152/6/R263.long. Accessed June 17, 2018.
24 Han J, Cao Z, Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang S. Effect of early pregnancy electromagnetic field exposure on embryo growth ceasing. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2010;39(3):349-52 (in Chinese).https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20568468.
25 Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BRR. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(7):881-883.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241519/pdf/ehp0111-000881.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.
26 Milham S. Evidence that dirty electricity is causing the worldwide epidemics of obesity and diabetes.Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(1):75-78. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.783853.
27 Yakymenko I, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Henshel D, Kyrylenko O, Kyrylenko S. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):186-202. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557.
28 Herbert M, Sage C. Findings in autism (ASD) consistent with electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency radiation (RFR). In: Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. Sec. 20. Sage Associates; 2012.http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec20_2012_F.... Accessed June 29, 2018.
29 Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 2008;19: 523–529. http://www.wifiinschools.com/uploads/3/0/4/2/3042232/divan_08_prenatal_postnatal_cell_phone_use.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.
30 Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;66(6):524-529. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.115402. Accessed July 16, 2018.31 Li D-K, Chen H, Odouli R. Maternal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy in relation to the risk of asthma in offspring. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(10):945-950.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/1107612. Accessed June 29, 2018.
32 Warnke U. Bees, Birds and Mankind: Destroying Nature by ‘Electrosmog.’ Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, Environment and Democracy; 2009. www.naturalscience.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/01/kompetenzinitiative-ev_study_bees-birds-and-mankind_04-08_english.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018.
33 Balmori A. Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology. 2009;16:191-199. doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.007. Accessed June 10, 2018.
34 Cammaerts MC, Johansson O. Ants can be used as bio-indicators to reveal biological effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(4):282-288. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.817336.
35 Broomhall M. Report detailing the exodus of species from the Mt. Nardi area of the Nightcap National Park World Heritage Area during a 15-year period (2000-2015). Report for the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Mt-Nardi-Wildlife-Report-to-UNESCO-FINAL.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.
36 Kordas D. Birds and Trees of Northern Greece: Changes since the Advent of 4G Wireless. 2017.https://einarflydal.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/kordas-birds-and-trees-o... final.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.
37 Waldmann-Selsam C, Balmori-de la Puente A, Breunig H, Balmori A. Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations. Sci Total Environ. 2016;572:554-569. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.045.
38 Balmori A. Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: The city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn Biol Med. 2010(1-2):31-35. doi: 10.3109/15368371003685363.
39 Margaritis LH, Manta AK, Kokkaliaris KD, et al. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014;33(3):165-189. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.800102.
40 Kumar NR, Sangwan S, Badotra P. Exposure to cell phone radiations produces biochemical changes in worker honey bees. Toxicol Int. 2011;18(1):70-72.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052591. Accessed June 17, 2018.
41 Balmori A. Efectos de las radiaciones electromagnéticas de la telefonía móvil sobre los insectos.Ecosistemas. 2006;15(1):87-95. https://www.revistaecosistemas.net/index.php/ecosistemas/article/ download/520/495. Accessed June 17, 2018.
42 Balmori A. The incidence of electromagnetic pollution on wild mammals: A new “poison” with a sloweffect on nature? Environmentalist. 2010;30(1):90-97. doi: 10.1007/s10669-009-9248-y
43 Magras IN, Xenos TD. RF radiation-induced changes in the prenatal development of mice.Bioelectromagnetics 1997;18(6):455-461.http://collectiveactionquebec.com/uploads/8/0/9/7/80976394/exhibit_r-62_magras_mice_study.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.
44 Otitoloju AA, Osunkalu VO, Oduware R, et al. Haematological effects of radiofrequency radiation from GSM base stations on four successive generations (F1 – F4) of albino mice, Mus Musculus. J Environ Occup Sci. 2012;1(1):17-22. https://www.ejmanager.com/mnstemps/62/62-1332160631.pdf?t=1532966199. Accessed July 30, 2018.
45 Magone I. The effect of electromagnetic radiation from the Skrunda Radio Location Station on Spirodela polyrhiza (L.) Schleiden cultures. Sci Total Environ. 1996;180(1):75-80. doi: 0048-9697(95)04922-3.
46 Nittby H, Brun A, Strömblad S, et al. Nonthermal GSM RF and ELF EMF effects upon rat BBB permeability.Environmentalist. 2011;31(2):140-148. doi: 10.1007/s10669-011-9307-z.
47 Haggerty K. Adverse influence of radio frequency background on trembling aspen seedlings: Preliminary observations. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2010; Article ID 836278.http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijfr/2010/836278.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.
48 Taheri M, Mortazavi SM, Moradi M, et al. Evaluation of the effect of radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi router and mobile phone simulator on the antibacterial susceptibility of pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. Dose Response. 2017;15(1):1559325816688527.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298474. Accessed June 18, 2018.
49 International Agency for Research on Cancer. Non-ionizing radiation, part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. In: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol 102. Lyon, France: WHO Press; 2013. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol102/mono102.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2018.
50 Carlberg M, Hardell L. Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints from 1965 on association and causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017:9218486.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376454. Accessed June 17, 2018.
51 Blackman CF. Evidence for disruption by the modulating signal. In: Sage C, Carpenter D., eds. Biolnitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-Based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Radiation. Sec. 15. Sage Associates; 2012. http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec15_2007_Modulation_Blackman.pdf. Accessed June 19, 2018.
52 Williams ER. The global electrical circuit: a review. Atmos Res. 2009;91(2):140-152. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.05.018.
53 Wever R. Human circadian rhythms under the influence of weak electric fields and the different aspects of these studies. Int J Biometeorol. 1973;17(3):227-232. www.vitatec.com/docs/referenz-umgebungsstrahlung/wever-1973.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018.
54 Wever R. ELF-effects on human circadian rhythms. In: ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects. (Persinger M, ed.) New York: Plenum; 1974:101-144.
55 Engels S, Schneider N-L, Lefeldt N, et al. Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird. Nature. 2014;509:353-356. doi:10.1038/nature13290.
56 Ludwig W, Mecke R. Wirkung künstlicher Atmospherics auf Säuger. Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie Serie B (Archives for Meteorology Geophysics and Bioclimatology Series B Theoretical and Applied Climatology). 1968;16(2-3):251-261. doi:10.1007/BF02243273.
57 Morley EL, Robert D. Electric fields elicit ballooning in spiders. Current Biology. 2018;28:1-7. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(18)30693-6.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2018.
58 Weber J. Die Spinnen sind Deuter des kommenden Wetters (Spiders Are Predictors of the Coming Weather). 1800; Landshut, Germany. “The electrical material works always in the atmosphere; no seasoncan retard its action. Its effects on the weather are almost undisputed; spiders sense it, and alter their behaviour accordingly.”
59 König H. Biological effects of extremely low frequency electrical phenomena in the atmosphere. J Interdiscipl Cycle Res. 2(3):317-323. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09291017109359276. Accessed June 10, 2018.
60 Sulman F. The Effect of Air Ionization, Electric Fields, Atmospherics, and Other Electric Phenomena On Man and Animal. American lecture series. Vol 1029. Springfield, Ill: Thomas; 1980.
61 König HL, Krüger, AP, Lang S, Sönning, W. Biologic Effects of Environmental Electromagnetism. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5859-9.
62 Sazanova E, Sazanov A, Sergeenko N, Ionova V, Varakin Y. Influence of near earth electromagnetic resonances on human cerebrovascular system in time of heliogeophysical disturbances. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium. August 2013:1661-1665.
63 Cherry N. Schumann resonances, a plausible biophysical mechanism for the human health effects of solar/geomagnetic activity. Natural Hazards. 2002;26(3):279-331. doi:10.1023/A:1015637127504.
64 Polk C. Schumann resonances. In Volland H, ed. CRC Handbook of Atmospherics. Vol. 1. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1982:111-178. https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.132044/2015.132044.Crc- Handbook-Of-Atmospherics-Vol-1#page/n115/mode/2up/search/polk. Accessed June 18, 2018.
65 Park C, Helliwell R. Magnetospheric effects of power line radiation. Science. 1978;200(4343):727-730. doi:10.1126/science.200.4343.727.
66 Bullough K, Kaiser TR, Strangeways HJ. Unintentional man-made modification effects in the magnetosphere. J Atm Terr Phys. 1985;47(12):1211-1223.
67 Luette JP, Park CG, Helliwell RA. The control of the magnetosphere by power line radiation. J Geophys Res. 1979;84:2657-2660.
68 Becker RO, Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. New York: Morrow; 1985:325-326.
69 Firstenberg A. Planetary Emergency. Cellular Phone Task Force website.www.cellphonetaskforce.org/planetary-emergency. Published 2018. Accessed June 10, 2018.
70 Becker RO. The basic biological data transmission and control system influenced by electrical forces. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1974;238:236-241. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb26793.x.
71 Maxey ES, Beal JB. The electrophysiology of acupuncture; How terrestrial electric and magnetic fields influence air ion energy exchanges through acupuncture points. International Journal of Biometeorology. 1975;19(Supp. 1):124. doi:10.1007/BF01737335.
72 Ćosić I, Cvetković D, Fang Q, Jovanov E, Lazoura H. Human electrophysiological signal responses to ELF Schumann resonance and artificial electromagnetic fields. FME Transactions. 2006;34:93-103.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1450-8230/2006/1450-82300602093C.... Accessed July 18, 2018.73 Cohen M, Behrenbruch C, Ćosić I. Is there a link between acupuncture meridians, earth-ionosphere resonances and cerebral activity? Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Bioelectromagnetism, Melbourne, Australia. 1998:173-174. doi: 10.1109/ICBEM.1998.666451.
74 Chevalier G, Mori K, Oschman JL. The effect of earthing (grounding) on human physiology. European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics. January 2006:600-621. http://162.214.7.219/~earthio0/wp- content/uploads/2016/07/Effects-of-Earthing-on-Human-Physiology-Part-1.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018.“Highly significant EEG, EMG and BVP results demonstrate that restoring the natural electrical potential of the earth to the human body (earthing) rapidly affects human electrophysiological and physiological parameters. The extreme rapidity of these changes indicates a physical/bioelectrical mechanism ratherthan a biochemical change.”
75 Firstenberg A. Earth’s Electric Envelope. In: The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life. Santa Fe, NM: AGB Press; 2017: 113-131.
76 Cannon PS, Rycroft MJ. Schumann resonance frequency variations during sudden ionospheric disturbances. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys. 1982;44(2):201-206. doi:10.1016/0021-9169(82)90124-6.
77 Technical Report. European Telecommunications Standards Institute; 2007:7. https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/125900_125999/125914/07.00.00_60/tr_125914v070000p.pdf AccessedJune 10, 2018. “The Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) is used for radiated performance measurements [and is] filled with tissue simulating liquid.”
78 Research on technology to evaluate compliance with RF protection guidelines. Electromagnetic Compatibility Laboratory, Tokyo. http://emc.nict.go.jp/bio/phantom/index_e.html. Accessed July 18, 2018.“SAR is measured by filling phantom liquid that has the same electrical properties as those of the humanbody in a container made in the shape of the human body, and scanning the inside using an SAR probe.”
79 Becker RO, Marino AA. Electromagnetism and Life. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1982:39.“The evidence seems to be quite conclusive that there are steady DC electric currents flowing outside of the neurones proper in the entire nervous system.”
80Nordenström B. Biologically Closed Electric Circuits. Stockholm: Nordic Medical Publications; 1983.
81 Nordenström B. Impact of biologically closed electric circuits (BCEC) on structure and function. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1992;27(4):285-303. doi:10.1007/BF02691165.
82 Devyatkov ND, ed. Non-Thermal Effects of Millimeter Radiation. Moscow: USSR Acad. Sci.; 1981 (Russian).
83 Devyatkov ND, Golant MB, Betskiy OV. Millimeter Waves and Their Role in the Processes of Life. (Millimetrovye volny i ikh rol' v protsessakh zhiznedeyatel'nosti). Moscow: Radio i svyaz' (Radio and Communication); 1991 (Russian).
84 Betskii OV. Biological effects of low-intensity millimetre waves (Review). Journal of Biomedical Electronics. 2015(1):31-47. http://www.radiotec.ru/article/15678. Accessed July 31, 2018.
85 Albanese R, Blaschak J, Medina R, Penn J. Ultrashort electromagnetic signals: Biophysical questions,safety issues and medical opportunities,” Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994;65(5 Supp):A116-A120.www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a282990.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.
86 Pepe D, Aluigi L, Zito D. Sub-100 ps monocycle pulses for 5G UWB communications. 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). 2016;1-4. doi: 10.1109/EuCAP.2016.7481123.
87 Nasim I, Kim S. Human exposure to RF fields in 5G downlink. arXiv:1711.03683v1.https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.03683. Accessed June 17, 2018.
88 Thielens A, Bell D, Mortimore DB. Exposure of insects to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields from 2 to 120 GHz. Nature/Scientific Reports. 2018;8:3924. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22271-3.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2018.
89 Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLOS One. 2017;12(10):e0185809.http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.01.... Accessed June 17, 2018.
90 Gandhi O, Riazi A. Absorption of millimeter waves by human beings and its biological implications. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 1986;34(2):228-235. doi:10.1109/TMTT.1986.1133316.
91 Russell CL. 5G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and
environmental implications. Environ Res 2018;165:484-495. https://zero5g.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/5-G-wireless-telecommunications-expansion-Public-health-and-environmental-implications-Cindy-L.-russell.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2018.
92 Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (review).Int J Oncol. 2017;51:405-413. doi:10.3892/ijo.2017.4046.
93 Pall M. 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and international health: Compelling evidence for eight distinct types of great harm caused by electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures and the mechanism that causes them. European Academy for Environmental Medicine. http://www.5gappeal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pall_2018.pdf. Published May 2018. Accessed June 22, 2018.
94 Markov M, Grigoriev Y. Wi-Fi technology: An uncontrolled global experiment on the health of mankind,Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(2):200-208. http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/Wi-fi_Technology_- _An_Uncontrolled_Global_Experiment_on_the_Health_of_Mankind_- _Marko_Markov_Yuri_G._Grigoriev.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2018.
95 Belyaev I, Alipov Y, Shcheglov V, Polunin V, Aizenberg O. Cooperative response of Escherichia coli cells to the resonance effect of millimeter waves at super low intensity. Electromagn Biol Med. 1994;13(1):53-66. doi:10.3109/15368379409030698.
96 Belyaev I. Nonthermal biological effects of microwaves: Current knowledge, further perspective, and urgent needs. Electromagn Biol Med. 2005;24(3):375-403. doi:10.1080/15368370500381844.
97 Bise W. Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior. Physiol Chem Phys. 1978;10(5):387-398.
98 Brauer I. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Wirkung von Meterwellen verschiedener Feldstärke auf das Teilungswachstum der Pflanzen. Chromosoma. 1950;3(1):483-509. doi:10.1007/BF00319492.
99 Kondra P, Smith W, Hodgson G, Bragg D, Gavora J, Hamid M. Growth and reproduction of chickens subjected to microwave radiation. Can J Anim Sci. 1970;50(3):639-644. doi:10.4141/cjas70-087.
100 Frey AH, Seifert E. Pulse modulated UHF energy illumination of the heart associated with change in heart rate. Life Sciences. 1968;7(10 Part 2):505-512. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(68)90068-4.
101 Mann K, Röschke J. Effects of pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human sleep.Neuropsychobiology. 1996;33(1):41-47. doi: 10.1159/000119247.
102 Tiagin NV. Clinical aspects of exposure to microwave radiation. Moscow: Meditsina; 1971 (Russian).
103 Belpomme D, Campagnac C, Irigaray P. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Rev Environ Health 2015;30(4):251–271. https://www.jrseco.com/wp- content/uploads/Belpomme-Environmental-health-2015.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.
104 Hecht K. Health Implications of Long-term Exposure to Electrosmog. Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity, the Environment and Democracy. 2016: 16, 42-46.http://kompetenzinitiative.net/KIT/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/KI_Brochur.... Accessed June 20, 2018.
105 Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health. 2016;31(3):363-397. doi:10.1515/reveh-2016-0011.
106 Schreier N, Huss A, Röösli M. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: A cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Soz Praventivmed. 2006;51(4):202-209. doi:10.1007/s00038-006-5061-2. Accessed July 16, 2018.
107 Schroeder E. Stakeholder-Perspektiven zur Novellierung der 26. BImSchV: Ergebnisse der bundesweiten Telefonumfrage im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Strahlenschutz (Report on stakeholder perspectives on amending the 26th Federal Emission Control Ordinance: Results of the nationwide telephone survey ordered by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection). Schr/bba 04.02.26536.020. Munich, Germany. 2002 (German). https://www.bfs.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/BfS/DE/berichte/emf/befuerchtung.... Accessed July 19, 2018.
108 Hallberg Ö, Oberfeld G. Letter to the editor: Will we all become electrosensitive? Electromagn Biol Med.2006;25:189-191. https://www.criirem.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/ehs2006_hallbergoberf.... Accessed June 22, 2018.
109 Brussels International Scientific Declaration on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. ECRI Institute. http://eceri-institute.org/fichiers/ 1441982765_Statement_EN_DEFINITIF.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed June 10, 2018.
110 Removal of barriers to entry, 47 U.S.C. § 253. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2015-title47/pdf/ USCODE-2015-title47-chap5-subchapII-partII-sec253.pdf; 5G For Europe: An Action Plan. European Commission; 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=17131. Accessed June 10, 2018.
111 Federal Register – Rules and Regulations. 47 CFR Part 1 [WT Docket No 17–79; FCC 18–30] Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment. 2018;83(86). Accessed June 10, 2018.
112 5G For Europe: An Action Plan. European Commission; 2016.http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=17131. Accessed June 10, 2018.
113 PCIA – The Wireless Infrastructure Association. Model wireless telecommunications facility siting ordinance. 2012. https://wia.org/wp-content/uploads/Advocacy_Docs/PCIA_Model_Zoning_Ordinance_June_2012.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2018.
114 Mobile services, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv). www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2016-title47/pdf/USCODE-2016-title47-chap5-subchapIII-partI-sec332.pdf: “No state or local government orinstrumentality thereof may regulate personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” Courts have reversed regulatorydecisions about cell tower placement simply because most of the public testimony was about health.
115 Cellular Telephone Company v. Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490, 495 (2nd Cir. 1999). https://openjurist.org/166/f3d/490/cellular-telephone-company-at-v-town-of-oyster-bay. Accessed June 10, 2018.; T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Loudoun County Bd. of Sup’rs, 903 F.Supp.2d 385, 407 (E.D.Va. 2012). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-4th-circuit/1662394.html. Accessed June 10, 2018.
116 Vogel G. A Coming Storm For Wireless? TalkMarkets. July 2017. www.talkmarkets.com/content/stocks--equities/a-coming-storm-for-wireless?post=143501&page=2. Accessed September 13, 2018.
117 Swiss Re: SONAR - New emerging risk insights. July 2014:22. http://media.swissre.com/documents/SONAR_2014.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2018. “[A]n increasing level of interconnectivity and the growing prevalence of digital steering and feedback systems also give rise to new vulnerabilities. These could involve cascading effects with multiple damages as well as long-lasting interruptions if the problems turned out to be complex and/or difficult to repair. Interconnectivity and permanent data generation give rise toconcerns about data privacy, and exposure to electromagnetic fields may also increase.”
118 Albert Einstein, letter to Max Born, Dec. 4, 1926.
119 Active Denial Technology. Non-Lethal Weapons Program. https://jnlwp.defense.gov/Press-Room/Fact-Sheets/Article-View-Fact-sheets/Article/577989/active-denial-technology/. Published May 11, 2016. Accessed June 10, 2018.
120 Conflicts of interest have frequently arisen in the past. For example, the EU Commission (2008/721/EC) appointed industry-supportive members for SCENIHR who submitted to the EU a misleading SCENIHR report on health risks, which gave the telecommunications industry carte blanche to irradiate EU citizens. The report is now quoted by radiation safety agencies in the EU. Another example is the US National Toxicology Program contracting with the IT’IS Foundation, which is funded by the entire telecommunications industry, to design, build and monitor the exposure facility for a two-year, 25-million-US-dollar study of cell phones. It subsequently produced a misleading report that is now quoted by industry officials in the US.
121 Ross M, Mills M, Toohey D. Potential climate impact of black carbon emitted by rockets. Geophys Res Lett. 2010;37:L24810. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2010GL044548. Accessed June 17, 2018.
122 Ross MN, Schaeffer PM. Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions. Earth’s Future. 2014;2:177-196. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2013EF000160. Accessed June 17, 2018.
123 Callicott JB, Mumford K. Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept. Conservation Biology. 1997;11(1):32-40. https://www.sierraforestlegacy.org/Resources/Community/Sustainability/ SY_CallicottMumford1997.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2018.
Alkuperäinen suomenkielinen käännös (PDF)